Home ›

Biblio

Found 27 results

Sort by: Author [ Title (Desc)] Type Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
W
SCHULEMANN-MAIER, G., Wie Patente der Software-Industrie schaden können, , 2008. Abstract
S
GROSCHE, A., "Software Patents – Boon or Bane for Europe?", International Journal of Law and Information Technology, vol. 14, issue 3: Oxford University Press, 2006. Abstract
STOBBS, G. A., Software Patents Worldwide, : Wolters Kluwer, 2007.
KLEMENS, B., Software Patents Don't Compute, , 2005.
TESKA, K., Software Patents 101, , 2008.
GUNTERSDORFER, M., Software patent law: United States and Europe compared, , 2003.
LEITH, P., "Software and Patents in Europe", Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law, Cambridge, UK, Cambrdige University Press, pp. 204, 2007. Abstract
, Software and Business Method Patents in Europe and the UK, : Carpmaels & Ransford, 1900.
SINGER, M., and D. STAUDER, "Second Part – Substantive Patent Law, Chapter I – Patentability", European Patent Convention, A Commentary, 3, Cologne, Carl Heymanns Verlag KG, 2003.
P
COCKBURN, I. M., and M. J. MacGARVIE, Patents, Thickets and the Financing of Early-Stage Firms: Evidence from the Software Industry, , Boston, US, Boston University, pp. 59, 11/2007. Abstract
BERESFORD, K., Patenting Software under the European Patent Convention, , London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2000.
LEITH, P., "Patenting programs as machines", SCRIPTed, vol. 4, issue 2, 06/2007.
PATERSON, G., "Patentable Subject-Matter", The European patent system - The law and practice of the European Patent Convention, London, Sweet & Maxwell, 1992.
, The patentability of software in the U.S. and Europe, , Submitted.
BAKELS, R., and B. P. HUGENHOLTZ, "The Patentability of Computer Programs", Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market of the European Parliament, Amsterdam, Institute of Information Law of the University of Amsterdam (IViR), pp. 52, 07/2002. Abstract
N
Office, E P., "Notice from the European Patent Office dated 26 March 2002 concerning business methods", Official Journal of the European Patent Office, vol. 25, issue 5: European Patent Office, pp. 260-261, 05/2002.
L
LEE, M. Q., A Long-Term View: Software Should Be Patentable in Europe, , 2005.
CRUZ, N., Letter to Michael Q. LEE, director in the Electronics Group at Stern Kessler Goldstein Fox, , 2005. Abstract
BARRETT, L. E., Legal analysis on the subject of the patentability of mathematical algorithms and computer programs, , 08/1989.
I
Lenz, D. K F., Interpretation of Article 52 of the European Patent Convention in view of the question, to what extent software is patentable, , 2005.
F
BETTEN, J., Für und Wider: Patentierbarkeit von Software (Computerprogramme und Geschäftsmethoden), , 2000.
E
ROGERS, D., "EPO decision on computer-implemented inventions and the treatment of non-technical aspects", Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, vol. 3, issue 6: Oxford University Press, pp. 2, 04/2008. Abstract
D
PILA, J., "Dispute over the Meaning of 'Invention' in Article 52(2) EPC - The Patentability of computer-implemented Inventions in Europe", IIC: International Review of Industrial Property & Copyright Law, vol. 36, 2005. Abstract
HECKEL, P., "Debunking the Software Patent Myths", Communications of the ACM, vol. 35, issue 6: ACM New York, NY, USA , pp. 121-140, 06/1992.
A
PILA, J., "Article 52(2) of the Convention on the Grant of European Patents: What Did the Framers Intend? A Study of the Travaux Preparatoires", IIC: International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, vol. 36, 2005. Abstract